Green group wants energy referendum cancelled over alleged campaign lies

The Local
The Local - [email protected]
Green group wants energy referendum cancelled over alleged campaign lies

Can a Swiss referendum be invalidated if one side is proved to be telling untruths?


A Swiss environment group thinks so. Greina Stiftung has filed an action against a forthcoming referendum, accusing the committee that launched it of lying, according to broadcaster RTS
On May 21st the Swiss people are set to vote on the government’s energy strategy 2050, a long-term plan that proposes a gradual withdrawal from nuclear power in favour of renewable resources. 
The strategy is opposed by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which instigated the forthcoming referendum to give the Swiss public the chance to vote against the strategy.
Under Swiss law, anyone can demand a referendum against a new piece of government legislation if they gather the required number of signatures, which the SVP did. 
But Greina Stiftung thinks the SVP-led committee has lied in its campaign against the strategy in saying that the government’s plans would cost each household 3,200 francs year. The figure quoted by the federal energy office is just 40 francs a year. 
As a result, the environment group has called on the Federal Chancellery to invalidate the referendum. 
The Chancellery’s role is to ensure the formal process for a referendum is carried out correctly, but it does not get involved in the arguments for or against. 
Speaking to RTS, Greina Stiftung director Gallus Cadonau said the Chancellery’s role was “too passive”, and that he was willing to take his case to the Swiss federal court if necessary. 
If the organization were to succeed in invalidating the referendum, it would be a first for Switzerland. 
No doubt the case would be eagerly observed by Britain, whose Brexit referendum was beset by claims of lying, particularly over the amount of money the country would supposedly save by leaving the European Union.
At the time, prominent ‘leave’ campaigners backed a highly-publicized claim that Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) would be £350million a week better off if Britain left the EU.
This week Britain’s parliament voted against an amendment to the Brexit bill that would have allowed an analysis of that claim, leading many remainers to berate the “disgraceful” behaviour of MPs who made the claim and then voted against the probe.


Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at [email protected].
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

See Also