For members


Reader question: Can you drink in public in Switzerland?

Keen for a drink in the park but can’t face another public nuisance charge? Here’s what you need to know about drinking in public in Switzerland.

Reader question: Can you drink in public in Switzerland?
Can you have this much booze-fuelled fun in the park in Switzerland? Photo by Elina Fairytale from Pexels

The closure or restriction of bars and restaurants due to the pandemic forced people to get creative. 

Parks, river banks and squares became a place where people could meet up and have a picnic or just an after-work beer – without a paper bag or a police patrol in sight. 

While for people from English-speaking countries this may seem a little weird, drinking in public in Switzerland – like with much of continental Europe – was allowed well before the pandemic. 

In fact, drinking in public in Switzerland is not only allowed but it is an important part of socialising. 

Unless you’re hollering, littering and/or signing “it’s coming home” at the top of your lungs, drinking in public will not be looked down upon in Switzerland, i.e. it does not have the same social stigma it does in other places. 

Is drinking in public legal in Switzerland? 

Yes. Basically anyone who is allowed to drink is allowed to do it in public. 

People aged 16 and over can drink beer and wine in public, while the age is 18 and over for spirits. 

If you’re in the southern canton of Ticino, the age is 18 for all types of alcoholic drinks. 

Technically speaking, it is not illegal for someone under 16 to drink in public in Switzerland, but it is of course illegal for them to buy it. 

Several cantons including Aargau, Bern, Solothurn and Zurich have laws which prevent someone from providing alcohol to minors, although parents are given an exemption from these rules. 

This means that if you want to give your 13-year-old a sip of beer to (hopefully) freak him out with the taste and send him towards a life of boring, predictable sobriety, you are allowed to do so in public. 

Bars will often put drinks in takeaway containers if you want to get it to go, particularly if it’s in a glass container. 

How does this work? Is it mayhem all the time? 

Despite the freedom to drink, most Swiss public squares are actually more orderly than those you’d find in the UK, Australia or the United States. 

A major reason for this is that while drinking may be allowed, Swiss authorities look to police the conduct rather than the drinking itself. 

Public nuisance laws will be imposed quickly and you may be asked to move on if you’re becoming a bit of a pest. 

Keep in mind that the same is likely to happen in most bars. The focus is not the drinking, but the conduct in question. 

So there are no restrictions? 

Switzerland has toyed with the idea of alcohol restrictions in public places before, but they have largely been ineffective. 

Switzerland’s SRF news agency reports that the city of Chur put in place an alcohol ban in 2008, but it was not successful. 

Urs Marti, a council representative from the city of Chur, said it had the effect of punishing the wrong people. 

“The alcohol ban in open areas is difficult to put in place. You punish the wrong people when you hand out fines” he said. 

The rule had been put in place to prevent noise, violence, littering, vandalism and anti-social behaviour. 

Marti notes that each of those “can with other laws be targeted and minimised”. 

Switzerland does have some restrictions regarding alcohol which mostly relate to where you can purchase alcohol and what you can purchase. 

The sale of alcohol is prohibited or restricted at gas stations in some Swiss cantons, while the country’s Migros supermarket chain does not sell alcohol or tobacco. 

READ MORE: Is Swiss supermarket Migros about to start selling alcohol and cigarettes?

There are also some restrictions on the sale of alcohol at gambling establishments, educational institutions and swimming and fitness centres. 

Member comments

  1. Where did you get the idea that it was illegal to drink in a public space in England and Wales. Anyone over 18 can drink alcohol in a public space in E&W including for example public parks in London. The places where people cannot drink alcohol is a place which has ‘A Public Space Protection Order. I have never come across such a place.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members


Is Switzerland’s male-only mandatory military service ‘discriminatory’?

Under Swiss law, all men must serve at least one year in compulsory national service. But is this discriminatory?

Swiss military members walk across a road carrying guns
A new lawsuit seeks to challenge Switzerland's male-only military service requirement. Is this discriminatory? FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP

All men aged between the ages of 18 and 30 are required to complete compulsory military service in Switzerland. 

A lawsuit which worked its way through the Swiss courts has now ended up in the European Court of Human Rights, where the judges will decide if Switzerland’s male-only conscription requirement violates anti-discrimination rules. 

Switzerland’s NZZ newspaper wrote on Monday the case has “explosive potential” and has “what it takes to cause a tremor” to a policy which was first laid out in Switzerland’s 1848 and 1874 Federal Constitutions. 

What is Switzerland’s compulsory military service? 

Article 59 of the Federal Constitution of Switzerland says “Every man with Swiss citizenship is liable for military service. Alternative civilian service shall be provided for by law.”

Recruits must generally do 18 weeks of boot camp (longer in some cases). 

They are then required to spend several weeks in the army every year until they have completed a minimum 245 days of service.

Military service is compulsory for Swiss men aged 18 and over. Women can chose to do military service but this is rare.

What about national rather than military service? 

Introduced in 1996, this is an alternative to the army, originally intended for those who objected to military service on moral grounds. 

READ MORE: The Swiss army’s growing problem with civilian service

Service is longer there than in the army, from the age of 20 to 40. 

This must be for 340 days in total, longer than the military service requirement. 

What about foreigners and dual nationals? 

Once you become a Swiss citizen and are between the ages of 18 and 30, you can expect to be conscripted. 

READ MORE: Do naturalised Swiss citizens have to do military service?

In general, having another citizenship in addition to the Swiss one is not going to exempt you from military service in Switzerland.

However, there is one exception: the obligation to serve will be waved, provided you can show that you have fulfilled your military duties in your other home country.

If you are a Swiss (naturalised or not) who lives abroad, you are not required to serve in the military in Switzerland, though you can voluntarily enlist. 

How do Swiss people feel about military and national service? 

Generally, the obligation is viewed relatively positively, both by the general public and by those who take part in compulsory service. 

While several other European countries have gotten rid of mandatory service, a 2013 referendum which attempted to abolish conscription was rejected by 73 percent of Swiss voters. 

What is the court case and what does it say? 

Martin D. Küng, the lawyer from the Swiss canton of Bern who has driven the case through the courts, has a personal interest in its success. 

He was found unfit for service but is still required to pay an annual bill to the Swiss government, which was 1662CHF for the last year he was required to pay it. 

While the 36-year-old no longer has to pay the amount – the obligation only lasts between the ages of 18 and 30 – Küng is bring the case on principle. 

So far, Küng has had little success in the Swiss courts, with his appeal rejected by the cantonal administrative court and later by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. 

Previous Supreme Court cases, when hearing objections to men-only military service, said that women are less suitable for conscription due to “physiological and biological differences”.

In Küng’s case, the judges avoided this justification, saying instead that the matter was a constitutional issue. 

‘No objective reason why only men have to do military service’

He has now appealed the decision to the European level. 

While men have previously tried and failed when taking their case to the Supreme Court, no Swiss man has ever brought the matter to the European Court of Human Rights. 

Küng told the NZZ that he considered the rule to be unjust and said the Supreme Court’s decision is based on political considerations. 

“I would have expected the Federal Supreme Court to have the courage to clearly state the obvious in my case and not to decide on political grounds,” Küng said. 

“There is no objective reason why only men have to do military service or pay replacement taxes. On average, women may not be as physically productive as men, but that is not a criterion for excluding them from compulsory military service. 

There are quite a few men who cannot keep up with women in terms of stamina. Gender is simply the wrong demarcation criterion for deciding on compulsory service. If so, then one would have to focus on physical performance.”

Is it likely to pass? 

Küng is optimistic that the Strasbourg court will find in his favour, pointing to a successful appeal by a German man who complained about a fire brigade tax, which was only imposed on men. 

“This question has not yet been conclusively answered by the court” Küng said. 

The impact of a decision in his favour could be considerable, with European law technically taking precedence over Swiss law.

It would set Switzerland on a collision course with the bloc, particularly given the popularity of the conscription provision. 

Küng clarified that political outcomes and repercussions don’t concern him. 

“My only concern is for a court to determine that the current regulation is legally wrong.”