Switzerland rapped for being 'sexist' towards men over pensions
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Tuesday rapped Switzerland for stopping a widower's pension, saying it amounted to sexism.
The case concerns Max Beeler, who lost his wife in an accident in 1994 and quit his job to raise his two children, aged one and four.
He received the pension until his youngest child reached 18 years but then it was stopped.
Under Swiss law, if he were a widow, he would have continued to receive a pension for life.
Beeler brought the case before the ECHR.
"At that time, he was 57 years old and had not been in gainful employment for over 16 years," an ECHR press release said, referring to the time when the payments stopped.
After Switzerland’s Federal Court dismissed the case, the man took it to the ECHR, which ruled that Beeler “had been subjected to unequal treatment that put widowers at a disadvantage in relation to widows”.
"He was not yet eligible for an old-age pension ... The applicant had stopped receiving the widower's pension simply because he was a man," it said.
"The unequal treatment to which the applicant had been subjected could not be said to have been reasonably and objectively justified," it added.
The Court also found that Swiss legislation in this matter “contributed to perpetuating prejudices and stereotypes”.
It ordered Switzerland to pay Beeler 5,000 euros in damages and 16,500 euros for expenses.
While this was the first case of this nature brought to the ECHR by a Swiss citizen, the Court handled 249 applications concerning Switzerland in 2021, of which 242 were declared inadmissible or struck out.
Among the cases that were ruled in applicants' favour in 2021 was one that faulted Switzerland for imposing a heavy fine on a Romanian woman for begging and then detaining her when she couldn't pay.
READ MORE: Switzerland condemned by rights court over fine for beggar
Comments
See Also
The case concerns Max Beeler, who lost his wife in an accident in 1994 and quit his job to raise his two children, aged one and four.
He received the pension until his youngest child reached 18 years but then it was stopped.
Under Swiss law, if he were a widow, he would have continued to receive a pension for life.
Beeler brought the case before the ECHR.
"At that time, he was 57 years old and had not been in gainful employment for over 16 years," an ECHR press release said, referring to the time when the payments stopped.
After Switzerland’s Federal Court dismissed the case, the man took it to the ECHR, which ruled that Beeler “had been subjected to unequal treatment that put widowers at a disadvantage in relation to widows”.
"He was not yet eligible for an old-age pension ... The applicant had stopped receiving the widower's pension simply because he was a man," it said.
"The unequal treatment to which the applicant had been subjected could not be said to have been reasonably and objectively justified," it added.
The Court also found that Swiss legislation in this matter “contributed to perpetuating prejudices and stereotypes”.
It ordered Switzerland to pay Beeler 5,000 euros in damages and 16,500 euros for expenses.
While this was the first case of this nature brought to the ECHR by a Swiss citizen, the Court handled 249 applications concerning Switzerland in 2021, of which 242 were declared inadmissible or struck out.
Among the cases that were ruled in applicants' favour in 2021 was one that faulted Switzerland for imposing a heavy fine on a Romanian woman for begging and then detaining her when she couldn't pay.
READ MORE: Switzerland condemned by rights court over fine for beggar
Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at [email protected].
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.
Please log in here to leave a comment.